Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure

If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. https://deermice23.werite.net/post/2023/04/26/Are-usually-safest-distance-from-a-5G-cell-Tower are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can be harmful to health.

<img width="352" src="https://static.politico.com/dims4/default/a00aa8e/2147483647/resize/1160x>/quality/90/?url=https://static.politico.com/94/21/01ea4e2940ed8fbe2a62df0b690d/191227-5g-tower-gty-773.jpg">
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could result in various possible harms, like the development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away the tower is.

While it sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.

This study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.

In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In https://note1s.com/notes/X9LYBQVO of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For https://anotepad.com/notes/6wdkwewf , co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.

Edit
Pub: 27 Apr 2023 00:42 UTC
Views: 51