What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell Structure

If https://baptistlighthouse.org/members/davidactor86/activity/217210/ 've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.

<img width="375" src="https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/cad796c31be1fa94430e9d796e74d0958e160469/r=x803&c=1600x800/local/-/media/USATODAY/USATODAY/2012/10/30/ap-cell-phone-towers-16_9.jpg">
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther the tower is.

While this sounds like a good idea however, people who live close to towers could be more vulnerable to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.

In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for https://cookbronze66.bravejournal.net/post/2023/04/26/Very-best-safest-distance-from-a-5G-cell-Structure exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For https://fnote.me/notes/cW3sQn , exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.

Edit
Pub: 26 Apr 2023 01:14 UTC
Views: 25