What is the safest distance from the 5G cell Tower system

If https://note1s.com/notes/X9LYBQVO 've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.

<img width="374" src="https://www.hiboost.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Hiboost-Cell-Tower.jpg">

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. https://writeablog.net/smashcave31/are-usually-safest-distance-from-your-5g-cell-structure can result in many potential problems, including an increased appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the further away you are from it.

While this sounds like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.

This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, called the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. https://vibrant-hyacinth-wb1z3n.mystrikingly.com/blog/how-far-away-from-the-5g-mobile-tower-system-should-you-be includes the false belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.

Edit
Pub: 27 Apr 2023 00:56 UTC
Views: 15