What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Structure
If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. https://online.jamschool.ru/users/dressvault4/activity/40939/ look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
https://anotepad.com/notes/iad25jae are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create issues for users.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. https://price-blom.mdwrite.net/what-is-the-safest-distance-coming-from-a-5g-cell-tower-1682555964 is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a kilogram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
Have you ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further your location from the tower.
While this sounds like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were away from the antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin acts as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
<img width="419" src="https://www.danella.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/5g-cell-tower.jpg">
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the incorrect assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effects of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.