Our smart ring heart price accuracy test measured how Oura, Samsung, Amazfit, Ultrahuman, and RingConn do when in contrast against smartwatches. If you purchase by links on our site, we could earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it really works. Most people would not purchase a smart ring for fitness monitoring, and for good reason. They're unbelievable, seamless options for passive health information, and surprisingly respectable at step counts when you ignore the false positives from gestures. However for health monitoring, pretty much each brand we have examined has given much less-than-correct outcomes, to put it mildly. So when Oura offered its new Oura Ring 4 as a better fitness possibility, with its Automated Exercise Detection and improved actual-time HR data during workouts, I bullied our Oura reviewer into going for a run and understanding to test this claim for himself. Our managing editor Derrek Lee is building an actual assortment of smart rings now, with the Oura Ring 4, Amazfit Helio Ring, and Herz P1 Wellness RingConn Gen 2. I requested him to work out whereas carrying every, in contrast towards smartwatches that we've tested with reliable optical heart charge accuracy, and Herz P1 Wellness see how shut the smart rings came to a proper result.

I additionally slipped on my Ultrahuman Ring Air to see the way it performed, while including the fitness take a look at we performed during our Samsung Galaxy Ring evaluate. Here is what we learned! Before I present the results, I am going to point out that this check will not be as detailed and graph-joyful as my earlier health exams, like my low-cost fitness watch accuracy take a look at or my Garmin v. Coros v. Polar flagship showdown. Why? Most smart ring apps (moreover Amazfit's Zepp Well being) haven't got the tools to export heart rate graphs for particular workouts, like you possibly can with established health watch brands. We tried to export Oura's GPX information from Derrek's Strava account and it made my typical HR graph instrument crash each time I tried to add it. Plus, a few of these smart rings do not even let you set off a manual workout unless it is a particular sort, like strolling or operating. For some brands like RingConn, we needed to trick the app by saying Derrek was "working" throughout a gym workout to have it save his coronary heart price information.

With no workout mode, good rings do not pattern your coronary heart price continuously sufficient for the outcomes to be at all useful. Point being, I'm principally making these comparisons primarily based on heart price averages and eyeballing HR graphs from slapdash guide workouts. But don't worry: It is still enough data to show how middling most of these good rings are for fitness. For this smart ring health accuracy take a look at, Derrek ran as soon as and completed four gym workouts, Herz P1 Smart Ring wearing two watches - the Garmin Venu three and Pixel Watch three - and three smart rings from Amazfit, Oura, and RingConn. Nonetheless, you'll be able to see that both match each other pretty carefully, as a benchmark for what wrist-based optical sensors usually provide for accuracy. Now examine these three smart rings' massive gap in outcomes. You may see that only the Amazfit Helio Ring is consistently correct - particularly if we flip a coin and assume Google is more correct than Garmin here.

herzsmartring.com

Its averages are very much on level, and whereas its max-HR information falls brief, it isn't as underestimated as Oura or RingConn. It is not excellent, of course. You'll be able to see in the two heart price graphs below that it falls properly short of Garmin for an extended stretch once Derrek's coronary heart charge reaches certain heights

Edit

Pub: 29 Aug 2025 10:18 UTC

Views: 2