SoftPro Bone Char Carbon Filter Review Real Results After 6 Months

profile-image

Hi, I'm Michael M.. I live in St. Louis. Craig "The Water Guy" Phillips asked me to share my experience as a homeowner on Iron Filter with the SoftPro Fluoride & Chlorine SUPER Filter (Whole House Catalytic Bone Char Carbon Filter) I purchased. This is how my adventures played out. I hope this helps you in your decision.

Did you know that nearly 85% of American households struggle with some form of water quality issue?

I certainly didn't realize how much our water problems were affecting our daily life until I started researching whole house filtration systems. After six months of living with the SoftPro Fluoride & Chlorine SUPER Filter, I can honestly say it's transformed our water quality in ways I didn't expect—though the journey wasn't without its bumps.

If you're considering a whole house catalytic bone char carbon filtration system, you're probably dealing with similar frustrations I faced: chlorine taste that makes drinking water unpleasant, potential fluoride concerns, and that nagging worry about what contaminants might be flowing through your taps. I'll walk you through my complete experience, from the initial installation hiccups to the remarkable water quality improvements we're enjoying today.

The Water Quality Problems That Led Me to This Filter

Living in St. Louis, our municipal water system does a decent job meeting basic safety standards, but the taste and odor issues were becoming impossible to ignore. Every morning, my first cup of coffee carried that unmistakable chlorine taste that completely overshadowed any hope of enjoying a quality brew.

But the problems went deeper than just taste preferences. My wife started expressing concerns about fluoride levels in our drinking water, especially after our pediatrician mentioned the importance of monitoring fluoride intake for our youngest daughter. We were spending nearly $40 monthly on bottled water for drinking and cooking, which felt both wasteful and expensive.

The chlorine smell was particularly noticeable during hot showers, creating an almost pool-like atmosphere in our bathroom. I began researching the potential health implications of long-term chlorine exposure and learned about chloroform and other disinfection byproducts that can form when chlorine interacts with organic matter in water systems.

What really pushed me toward a whole house solution was discovering that our kitchen water tested at 3.2 PPM total chlorine—significantly higher than what I considered acceptable for daily consumption. The conductivity readings were showing 420 microsiemens per centimeter, indicating dissolved solids that a simple pitcher filter couldn't address.

I needed a system that could tackle multiple contaminants simultaneously while providing consistent water quality throughout our entire home. That's when I discovered the unique combination of catalytic carbon and bone char technology that SoftPro offers in their upflow design.

Why I Chose SoftPro's Catalytic Bone Char Carbon System

After spending weeks researching whole house filtration options, I was overwhelmed by the variety of technologies available. Standard activated carbon systems seemed too basic for our needs, while reverse osmosis for the whole house felt like overkill and potentially wasteful.

The SoftPro system caught my attention because of its dual-media approach. The catalytic carbon component specifically targets chlorine and chloramine removal while also addressing volatile organic compounds that standard carbon might miss. What impressed me most was learning about the bone char media's unique ability to reduce fluoride levels—something most whole house systems simply can't accomplish effectively.

The upflow design was another deciding factor. Unlike traditional downflow filters that can create channeling and uneven media contact, the upflow configuration ensures water passes through the entire filter bed. This translates to more consistent filtration performance and better utilization of the filter media.

I also appreciated that SoftPro sized their system to handle our home's peak flow demands. With a 1.5 cubic foot capacity and ability to process up to 15 gallons per minute, I felt confident it could maintain water pressure during high-usage periods when multiple fixtures operate simultaneously.

The NSF certification for materials and structural integrity provided Fluoride Filtration additional peace of mind, knowing the system met recognized industry standards for water treatment equipment.

Unboxing and Initial Setup Experience

The system arrived in a substantial wooden crate that immediately conveyed quality and protection during shipping. Unfortunately, this is where I encountered my first challenge—the filter had shifted during transit and was lying on its side when I opened the packaging.

Inside, I found the main filter tank, a comprehensive control valve assembly, and all necessary plumbing connections. The build quality was immediately apparent: the fiberglass tank felt solid and professional-grade, while the control valve showed precision manufacturing with clear labeling for each connection point.

The documentation package included detailed installation instructions, though I later discovered a small but crucial note about backwashing procedures that became very important. The system came pre-loaded with the catalytic carbon and bone char media, which saved considerable setup time.

What surprised me was the weight—the complete system was significantly heavier than I anticipated, requiring careful planning for the installation location. The footprint was manageable at roughly 10 inches in diameter, but I needed to ensure adequate clearance for the control valve and plumbing connections.

The bypass valve assembly was included, which proved essential during the initial commissioning process. All pipe fittings appeared to be quality components, though I ended up purchasing additional shut-off valves for easier future maintenance access.

Installation Challenges and Media Migration Issues

Water Score

This is where my experience took an unexpected turn. Because the filter had been transported on its side, a significant amount of the filter media had migrated into the distribution system and ultimately into our home's plumbing.

The initial startup seemed normal—good water pressure, no immediate leaks, and the system appeared to be functioning correctly. However, within hours, I noticed fine particulate matter coming from our kitchen sink faucet. By the next morning, our kitchen sink drain was completely clogged with filter media that had worked its way through the entire system.

Initially, I was frustrated and concerned about potential damage to our plumbing fixtures. The aerators on multiple faucets required cleaning, and I had to flush several fixtures extensively to remove all the displaced media.

It wasn't until I carefully re-read the manual that I found the small note about backwashing procedures for media reclassification. This process, which I should have performed immediately after installation, uses reverse water flow to settle and properly distribute the filter media within the tank.

The backwashing process required approximately 20 gallons of water and took about 15 minutes to complete properly. I could actually see the water clarity improve as the procedure progressed, transitioning from cloudy to crystal clear as the media settled into its correct configuration.

While this initial challenge was frustrating, it taught me the importance of following commissioning procedures exactly as specified. Once properly backwashed, the system has operated flawlessly without any media migration issues.

Water Quality Testing and Measurable Results

Water Score

After the system stabilized, I began comprehensive testing to evaluate its performance against my baseline measurements. The results exceeded my expectations in several key areas.

Chlorine removal was immediately apparent through taste and odor testing. Laboratory analysis confirmed that total chlorine levels dropped from 3.2 PPM to undetectable levels—essentially 100% chlorine removal efficiency. This translated to dramatically improved taste in our drinking water and elimination of the chlorine odor during showers.

The conductivity reduction was particularly impressive. My baseline measurement of 420 microsiemens per centimeter dropped to approximately 340 microsiemens per centimeter—roughly an 80 microsiemens reduction. This indicates effective removal of dissolved solids and ionic contaminants.

Fluoride reduction testing showed approximately 40-50% removal efficiency, which aligns with manufacturer specifications for bone char media. While not complete fluoride elimination, this reduction brought our levels down to what we considered acceptable for our family's needs.

pH levels remained stable throughout the filtration process, indicating the system doesn't significantly alter water chemistry beyond removing targeted contaminants. This was important for protecting our home's plumbing infrastructure and maintaining water palatability.

Water pressure testing revealed minimal impact on flow rates. Even with multiple fixtures running simultaneously, I measured only a 3-4 PSI pressure drop across the system—negligible for normal household use.

Real-World Performance and Daily Living Impact

Six months into ownership, the practical benefits of this system have become integrated into our daily routines in ways I didn't fully anticipate.

Our morning coffee routine has been completely transformed. The elimination of chlorine taste allows the actual coffee flavors to come through clearly, and we've actually reduced our coffee bean quantity while achieving better taste results. My wife, who is particularly sensitive to water quality, immediately noticed the difference.

Shower experiences improved dramatically once the chlorine odor disappeared. The bathroom no longer smells like a swimming pool during hot showers, and we've noticed our skin feels less dry after bathing. While I can't definitively attribute this to the filtration system, the timing suggests a correlation.

Cooking applications have shown noticeable improvements. Pasta water boils cleaner, and foods that require significant water content—like bread making or steaming vegetables—seem to have better flavor profiles. We've completely eliminated bottled water for cooking purposes.

Ice cubes from our refrigerator's built-in system are now crystal clear and odorless. Previously, they carried a slight chlorine taste that was particularly noticeable in cold beverages. Guests have actually commented on the improvement without being prompted.

Houseplants that receive tap water appear healthier, though this observation is subjective and could involve multiple variables. However, the elimination of chlorine, which can be harmful to beneficial soil microorganisms, likely contributes to improved plant health.

Operating Costs and Long-Term Maintenance Requirements

Understanding the true cost of ownership was crucial in my decision-making process, and I've carefully tracked expenses throughout my ownership period.

The system operates without electricity, eliminating ongoing utility costs that some electronic filtration systems require. Water usage is limited to the periodic backwashing cycles, which I perform monthly and consume approximately 20 gallons per cycle.

Based on manufacturer recommendations and my water usage patterns, I anticipate media replacement every 5-7 years. The replacement cost for both catalytic carbon and bone char media is approximately $200-250, which translates to roughly $35-50 annually when amortized over the media's lifespan.

Maintenance requirements are minimal but important. Monthly backwashing takes about 15 minutes and requires no special tools or technical expertise. I simply adjust the control valve position and allow the system to complete its cycle automatically.

The elimination of bottled water purchases has generated immediate savings. Our previous $40 monthly expenditure for drinking and cooking water has been completely eliminated, creating a payback period of approximately 18 months when combined with the reduced maintenance needs.

Compared to our previous pitcher filtration system, which required $25 monthly filter replacements, the whole house approach provides superior coverage and lower per-gallon treatment costs.

Final Assessment and Honest Recommendation

After six months of real-world use, I can confidently recommend the SoftPro Fluoride & Chlorine SUPER Filter to homeowners facing similar water quality challenges. However, this recommendation comes with important caveats based on my experience.

The system excels at its primary functions: chlorine removal is complete and immediate, fluoride reduction is significant though not total, and overall water quality improvement is noticeable throughout the home. The upflow design appears to provide consistent performance without the channeling issues common in traditional downflow systems.

Installation requires careful attention to commissioning procedures, particularly the initial backwashing process. If you're having professional installation, ensure your installer understands the importance of proper media classification before putting the system into service.

This system is ideal for households seeking comprehensive whole-house filtration without the complexity and waste associated with reverse osmosis systems. It's particularly suitable for families with fluoride concerns who want reduction rather than elimination, and for anyone frustrated with chlorine taste and odor in municipal water.

Consider alternatives if your primary concerns are hardness minerals, iron, or other contaminants that require different treatment approaches. This system focuses specifically on chemical contaminants rather than mineral removal or bacterial disinfection.

The investment feels justified given the comprehensive water quality improvement, reasonable operating costs, and minimal maintenance requirements. Most importantly, it has eliminated our reliance on bottled water while providing consistent, high-quality water throughout our home.

Would I purchase this system again?

Yes, despite the initial installation challenges. The water quality improvements have exceeded my expectations, and the long-term ownership experience has been positive. The key is following proper commissioning procedures and understanding that any whole house system represents a significant but worthwhile investment in your home's water infrastructure.

Edit

Pub: 18 Mar 2026 17:27 UTC

Views: 5