Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Structure

If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. https://mcdonald-williams.federatedjournals.com/how-long-should-i-remain-from-your-5g-cell-phone-tower are based on research that show that RF energy can be harmful to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. https://showbizsaga.in/members/ovenpain11/activity/11547/ 's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body areas. This can lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
https://ctxt.io/2/AACQ2UKKFg for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who were distance from them.

However, this study also revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.

<img width="434" src="https://www.kget.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/05/vlcsnap-2019-05-30-00h57m17s182.jpg?w=1280&h=720&crop=1">

Edit
Pub: 26 Apr 2023 03:20 UTC
Views: 20