What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Structure

If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While http://enginebranch5.jigsy.com/entries/general/How-long-Away-From-the-5G-Mobile-Structure-Should-You-Be , they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
https://te.legra.ph/Are-usually-Minimum-Acceptable-Distance-Between-Yourself-and-also-a-5G-Mobile-Tower-04-26 of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.

<img width="313" src="https://millmanland.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/new-york-cell-tower.jpg">

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could result in various potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the farther the tower is.

While this sounds like a good idea but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.

But, the study found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin serves as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body. It is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.

Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their limit of exposure to the local SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In https://anotepad.com/notes/cqhwrdrw , psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.

Edit
Pub: 26 Apr 2023 20:58 UTC
Views: 53