Very best safest distance from the 5G cell System
If you've ever wandered through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
<img width="322" src="https://www.incomeinvestors.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/cell-phone-tower-on-top-of-residential-building-in-city-5g-antenna-base-broadcast-broadcasting-cell_t20_xXn3pX.jpg">
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. https://squareblogs.net/foldpansy7/how-long-can-you-proceed-from-the-5g-cell-phone-tower-without-staying-unsafe could result in various possible harms, like the development of skin diseases such as dermatitis and skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like a good idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those living further far from antennas.
However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. https://writeablog.net/tunemanx6/what-lengths-away-from-a-new-5g-mobile-tower-system-for-anybody-who-is is also the biggest organ in the human body. https://te.legra.ph/How-Far-Can-You-Move-From-your-5G-Mobile-phone-Tower-Without-Getting-Unsafe-04-26-2 is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on a variety of assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.