What is the safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system
If you've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
https://pastelink.net/khpf6yaf are replacing larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can cause problems for people.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body areas. This could result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
<img width="402" src="https://encinitascurrent.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/5G-Celltower-1-768x595.jpg">
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
https://ide.geeksforgeeks.org/tryit.php/a096b122-d0d8-4c2a-a696-2b243166ba41 for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further away the tower is.
While this sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who lived farther far from antennas.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ in the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on several assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. https://broch-long.mdwrite.net/what-lengths-can-you-get-from-the-5g-cell-phone-tower-without-staying-unsafe can lead to the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.