Bello /Ne

Queen Bulu's Extended Typology

Hi everyone. My name is Blue and I'm 16 years old. Typology is a special interest of mine and I like to talk about it :blush: One thing I like about typology is that it has an appeal for virtually anyone. Fe doms might like it because they get to interact and learn more about people, E9s might like it as to feel more comfortable in their identity, 2Ls might like it because they like the logical consistency but the ability to talk and learn more about things... There is something for everyone!

Anything boldened is either a type or something important.
Anything dotted is a link.
Anything italicised is just for emphasis.

Apologies for phone users... You can view it on mobile, it's just significantly better on computer LOL


ENTJ (Te>Ni=Se>Fi) sp/so 387 (3w2) + VLFE Choleric-Sanguine LIE-1Te ET(N) [S]cO/E/I Mo[T]WvRx

Few things right off the bat...

  • Low Fi and high Te doesn't innately make me some evil villain
  • I relate to Sp3/E3 in general the most + Enneagram is my favourite system
  • There are several systems I don't like that you'll read about later
  • People are still people beyond their theoretical typology. The boxes fit to you, not the other way around.

I am definitely an ENTJ. I've been misread as ESxP a lot as I'm not a very stereotypical one, and because I typed as E8 for a long time (Yeesh). I typed as ENTP for a while there, but nothing else in MBTI fits like ENTJ does. You can read more about that on my Bearblog if you like!

I said I was TeSe for a good while, and considering that was summer, it's a very fair observation. But I've come to find out that my Ni is a lot more developed than I once thought it was--I'm just really bad at seeing it beyond the mega aggressive Te and the playful Se. So, even though I'm technically TeNi, I still write Ni=Se, seeing as they tend to work either at the same time (Ni: Hold on a minute Se: Dude fuck me in the ass I want it now) or that's just what's most visible to other people.

I have a whole theory about how NiFe's seem a lot more extroverted than they really are because their Fe works overdrive to overcompensate their unappearing Ni, but that's for a later post.

Back on track, I am also... Sp3! Surprise, Sp3cialgirl is a Sp3. I relate to So3 and Sp2 a good amount too (mostly So3), and somewhat Sx3 (as you can find above in the plus sign for my full enneagram rankings), but nothing fits like good ol' Sp3.

VLFE... Ahhh....Psychosophy... My old friend
This was the first system I got into that was actually just beyond MBTI and enneagram wings because--surprise surprise, it's super simple and frankly pretty easy to learn. When people don't overcomplicate it that is... The thing is, when you get a system as simple as psychosophy, some people like to overcomplicate it. It happened to Classical Jungian = MBTI, and now the rage is Psychosophy = Attitudinal Psyche.

I type as VLFE, as seen as above. I am definitely 1V, no doubts about it. The only time I thought I might've been 3V was when I was in a really dark spot. I'm 1V queen. I typed as VFLE for a little while. I think it appeared like I had low logic as a kid, particularly 1V/4L and then maybe even 1V/3L when I was a young teenager (12-15). But that was just a raging 2L with massive insecurities, as any teenager has...

I sometimes feel as if AP/Psychosophy is a flawed system, because aside from 1V, I feel (at least somewhat) connected to 3F, 3L, and even 3E. I think I'm just a very aggressive person LOL. That's not entirely negative, but still, it's a part of me. Anyway--I've never felt particularly connected to 2L/4E, as slightly mentioned above. But there is no way in hell that I'm 2E/4L, so that's just What I'm Going With. Can't do much about it.

If you're interested in what I consider "good descriptions" for AP/Psychosophy, this guy on Reddit has made some GREAT examples. Bare in mind they're a little exaggerated, and slightly 2D... But I don't blame them. They're pretty good regardless. Volition, Emotion, Physics, Logic.

Well, now we're on Jungian and Socionics. If you are a fan of MBTI, you may be skipping over this and sighing. If you're a MBTI hater, this is your MBTI. Make sense?

Socionics is...hard to think about. I appreciate it for all that it is, and I love researching it, but I can completely understand why someone would skip over socionics in favour of other systems, and just view it as a predecessor to 'better' or more 'efficient' systems. That being said, I think the complexities of the system are for a reason! I do believe I get more out of socionics on a regular basis against something like MBTI (LIE-1Te vs ENTJ).

Lets look at Te in Jungian, MBTI, and Socionics.

Jungian: Mostly concerned with objective logic to structure the whole external world. Needs actual measurable criteria.
MBTI: Mostly concerned with quick decisions. Organisation, productivity, often without deep theoretical nuance. Doing things to get them done.
Socionics: Mostly concerned with research and theoretics. Deals with things by figuring out 'how to make them better'. Described as a lot more blunt and Ni heavy than the other two.

Jung and MBTI Te seem quite similar, but it's important to note that Jung = theoretical function of consciousness, MBTI = behavioral trait.

Jungian Te is more about the actual stream of consciousness that happens and their internal mental mechanisms. MBTI is often frowned upon for this reason, because MBTI Te doesn't actually delve into any particularly complex neurologics... It just kind of. States a few personality traits someone may have.

Like, imagine a serial killer. You know they kill, the process they go through when they kill, but you don't know their motive, what they're thinking, why they've gotten to that point... etc.

MBTI simplifies Te into observable patterns, so how someone tends to act. It focuses on things like being efficient, decisive, structured, goal-oriented... It doesn’t dive into why someone processes info that way, just that they do it.

Socionics is a slightly different kettle of fish. Many people have noted that those who relate best to the socionic description of 'ENTJ' (or, in this case, LIE), tend to be ENTJ e7. Though, in this case, it's good to remember that Socionics and MBTI don't necessarily correlate like that. Just that it's common.

I actually relate to LIE-1Te quite a lot. I find it's actually very representative. Though it's not exactly and entirely me, I feel it hits the nail on the head a lot closer than the ENTJ description. Interesting. I've never particularly agreed or felt represented by the 'commander' stereotype that is often perpetuated by 16p-ers.

I use Te 24/7, especially IRL. I remember using Ni even as a little kid. My Se is obvious to any of my friends. My Fi is like an abused baby. Theoretically, I am very, very ENTJ. But the actual baseline personality that is spread as apart of ENTJ propaganda is hardly me. That being said--LIE-1Te isn't perfect either! It actually reads a little antisocial. Though I did have to get tested for ASPD. So hey, maybe I just don't know myself that well (inferior Fi joke) (Laugh) (This is where you laugh)

Mo[T]WvRx. No one hates Motives like I do.
I mean, fuck man! Why the hell are we bringing politics into typology? It genuinely pisses me off so much. This system is a shitty version of Big Five which is already questionable in my eyes. Seriously, it sucks. Theres a reason I have an X instead of a G or S.

For those who aren't in the know, which, bless your soul:
S Conservative and racist
G
Liberal and open

"But Blue...You're a liberal. Just type as 'g'." Unfortunately, I have read a lot about motives and thats not really how G works. When I first was researching it, the simplified version was that 'S' was more protective of themselves and their inner circle. I was like, fuck yeah. Thats what the self-preservation instinct is for. I read more into it. Oh... It's less so about keeping yourself safe, but moreso about keeping others out...

Keeping others out of your country.
Bitch what?

Motives actually pisses me off so bad man. You can immediately tell that it was made by someone who is conservative as well, because the 'G' description (which is meant to be liberal) isn't even properly liberal. It just describes someone who doesn't think and someone who is needlessly open. It's such a horribly flawed system.

I still technically keep it in my typology because it's a decently popular system, but many of the typology people I have met throughout the years also hate Motives. Shoutout to my friend Hiroq who also despises Motives but keeps it in their bio

[S]cO/E/I Ok... I knew I had to end on something that wasn't motives. You don't want a bad taste in your mouth after reading this, right? + If you've read all this up until this point you are a serious fan. So thank you.

Anyways, Big Five. This is again, one of those cases where nothing else particularly fits, so I have to go with the extremist option. SCOEI is special man. I feel like if anything, it describes me when I'm very stressed or being pretty unhealthy? It's not so bad. I can relate to some of it.

"likes giving speeches, not easily moved to tears, manipulative, unapologetic, knows where life is going, narcissistic, exacting in their work, does not second guess self, untouched by other people's feelings, the first to act, level emotions, never at a loss for words, opinionated, demanding, goes after what they want, believes in a logical answer for everything, not very religious, show off, calm in crisis"

This is me at a very extreme. Y'know? I think I display many of these traits. But that makes me seem as if I am some unemotional NPD logic-only being. For example, 'untouched by other people's feelings'. Well, I am very touched by my friend's feelings. I care for them deeply. But if someone hates on me, I pay no mind to them. But 'manipulative', 'does not second guess self'? Not often, but yes, I make mistakes and I can sometimes second guess myself.

I just think that many of these typology descriptions take it to a big extreme. Like, Big Five is what psychologists will use in place of MBTI, but it just feels like MBTI in another font--and way too wordy. I'm personally not a fan of Big Five. I know I said I wouldn't end on a bad note, but... This is better than Motives.


Thank you so much for reading! This has been a huge infodump on my typology and typology in general. As previously mentioned I fucking love typology and it brings me so much comfort. If you ever want to discuss typology (as in, you already like typology, and you don't just want me to type you), DM me!

Discord @sp3cialgirl
Alterspring
@sans Main

Edit

Pub: 13 May 2019 03:34 UTC

Edit: 10 Aug 2025 23:59 UTC

Views: 2078