Aryanity: Forbidden History of the Aryan Race

By: A. B. Chapman


Chapter 9: The Great Rebellion

The cause of this division within the race of gods is consistent in many ancient texts that mention the war. They describe how some of the “gods” (Aryans) broke the taboo of interbreeding with their creation (primitive slaves), thus creating hybrids who greatly multiplied, and that this hybrid slave race rebelled and attempted to subvert the authority of the ruling elite. As the Aryans migrated and conquered the primitive peoples around the world they established themselves as “Gods” in the eyes of their slave races and their slaves were considered a “creation” of the Aryans for they had applied the same knowledge of animal husbandry to these primitive races to create a domesticated breed of slave by selectively breeding traits which would produce the most obedient, and hard- working salves, yet things went horribly wrong when the Aryans began breeding with these domestic slave, thus producing a race of Slave/Aryan hybrids who possessed higher intellects and a more independent and rebellious mentality. Consider these passages of Genesis 1-26 and Genesis 2-15:

1-26 Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals,[a] and over all the creatures that move along the ground”.
2-15 The LORD God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it.

The act of creating mankind in the image of God (pluralized as “us” and “our” indicating that the biblical account came from earlier accounts depicting a “race of gods”) simply reflects the selective breeding customs of the Aryans in picking only those who demonstrated ideal traits. In the case of the slave race they were bred to be ideal slaves, bred to be docile and obedient…domesticated. Yet mention is also made in many ancient texts that interbreeding between the slaves races and the race of gods was common, but was looked upon as an abomination and that it was decided that the progeny of the race of Gods and the slave races should be destroyed as they had become too independent and rebellious. The story of the Nephilim portrayed in the Old Testament (both canonical and apocryphal) paints a fairly accurate picture of the herds of overpopulated and rebellious hybrid slaves being allowed to perish as the floodwaters came.

For many years the accepted translation for the word “Nephilim” (Hebrew, naphil) was “giant,”[1] though this may not be entirely accurate. Many suggested interpretations are based on the assumption that the word is a derivative of Hebrew verbal root n-ph-l “fall”.

Linguist Adam Clarke took it as a perfect participle, “fallen,” “apostates”.[2] The majority of ancient biblical versions, including the Septuagint, Theodotion, Latin Vulgate, Samaritan Targum, Targum Onkelos and Targum Neofiti, interpret the word to mean “giants,”[3] though Symmachus translated it as “the violent ones” and Aquila’s translation has been interpreted to mean either “the fallen one”.[4] The term “Nephilim” occurs only twice in the Hebrew Bible. The first is Genesis 6:1–4, immediately before the account of Noah’s ark.

Genesis 6 depicted the creation of “man” (slave race) and the creation of a hybrid race (Nephilim) when the “sons of God” (Aryans) bred with “the daughters of men” (Slave race.):

1 And it came to pass, when men (slave races) began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
2 That the sons of God (Aryans) saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.
3 And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years. (A reference to the slave races limitations in lifespan)
4 There were Nephilim in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bear children to them (the slave masters impregnated their slaves and made mongrels), the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.
5 And God (the King of the Aryans) saw that the wickedness of man (slave races) was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
6 And it repented the LORD that he had made man (bred slaves) on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
7 And the LORD said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.

The second time the Nephilim are written about in the Hebrew Torah is Numbers 13:32– 33, where ten of the Twelve Spies report that they have seen fearsome giants in Canaan.

Yet it is important to understand the distinction that the Nephilim were the “fallen” race.

“And there we saw the Nephilim, the sons of Anak, who come of the Nephilim; and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight”.

This tale is an echo of older Sumerian accounts of the creation of the Adamic hybrid slave race and their virtual destruction. It is recorded in ancient cuneiform tablets that the Sumerian culture was established by a race of giant, light-skinned, blue-eyed “Gods” called “the Annunaki“ (also transcribed as: Anunaki, Anunna, Anunnaku, Ananaki and other variations [5]) The name is variously written “a-nuna,” “a-nuna-ke-ne,” or “a-nun- na,” meaning “princely offspring” or “offspring of Anu,” According to The Oxford Companion to World Mythology, the Annunaki: “…are the Sumerian deities of the old primordial line; they are chthonic deities of fertility, associated eventually with the underworld, where they became judges. They take their name from the old sky god An (Anu)”.

It is recorded that the Annunaki were extremely technologically advanced, possessing flying ships, advanced weaponry, and vast astronomical knowledge unknown to modern man until the invention of the telescope. Ancient Sumerian cosmology accounted for twelve planets, and they understood the structure of the solar system with planets revolving around the sun. Only 5 planets are visible with the naked eye, and for much of history Humans believed that Saturn was the last planet. Uranus wasn’t discovered until the 17th century and wasn’t named until the 18th century, Neptune and Pluto, which can only be seen through telescopes weren’t discovered until the 19th and 20th centuries respectively. Yet somehow the ancient Sumerians knew about these planets and possibly more planetoids beyond Pluto at a time when mainstream archeology states that technology didn’t exit like telescopes, space flight, etc. [6] Many parallels exist between Genesis and the ancient Sumerian epics, particularly “the Epic of Gilgamesh” both of which record the creation of humankind in similar fashion, an ancient flood or deluge as well as the building of an ark, a race of angelic beings existing on earth in ancient times, and the rebellion against the gods. Yet the later Hebrew version omits the ancient Sumerian depiction of “mankind” or “Adamites” as slaves to the “race of gods”. This race of gods were Aryans who migrated into the Fertile Crescent as early as the 10th millennium B.C. The “established” estimates placing the rise of Sumer at the 6th millennium B.C. may simply prove that the Sumerian civilization may have been built in the vicinity of land that was previously inhabited in antediluvian times by the race of the gods, the original location of “proto-Sumer” now under water in the Persian Gulf. The Sumerians own historical records describing their civilization being present during the time of The Deluge, proves that they had passed down unbroken yet not entirely accurate knowledge from the Ice Age flood.

Sumerian artwork reveals that the upper-classes were indeed Aryan in appearance. The busts of Sumerian nobles reveals their distinctly Aryan features with white alabaster being the stone used to make the statues and eyes made of blue lapis lazuli. It is recorded in the Sumerian epics that the ancient gods An, Enlil, Enki and Ninhursanga created the “black-headed” people i.e. the Semitic sub-race of Caucasians by mixing their own blood with “mud” (which may be a symbolic term for Negritos or mud-people.) That the lower classes of Sumer were called black-headed is evidence of a fair haired population within Mesopotamia since this term was employed as an ethnological contrast. This fair haired population was the minority ruling elite or Aryans whereas the majority population was early proto-Semitic peoples.

It is important to note that the term “Semite” is derived from the biblical story of the flood and that Noah had three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth. The Semites were those who were supposedly descended from Shem, and it was believed by the early Semites that the non-Semitic peoples were descended from Noah’s sons Ham and Japheth. The Caucasians of North Africa (Berbers, Libyans, and Egyptians) were believed to be Hamites, and the Indo-European or Aryan tribes were believed to be descended from Japheth. Yet this is a mythologized account created by Semites that does not have any basis in reality, since both of these branches existed before and after the flood as distinct peoples. Those peoples of North Africa, the Mediterranean, and Western Europe shared common Atlantean origin, and the Eurasian Aryan (Indo-European) peoples were closely related to their western cousins. The flood myth as it is depicted in the bible was simply a much later Semitic retelling of the flood as it was written by the ancient Aryan Sumerians.

As was recorded in the ancient Sumerian Epic of Gilgamesh [7], Gilgamesh was the king of Uruk (present day Iraq.) It is written that after a futile quest for the meaning of life, he is faced with the impending horror of his own mortality when his best friend, Enkidu, is marked to perish by the god Enlil. Vainly searching for ever-lasting life, he goes on a journey to Dilmun the primordial garden of Eden, to seek out Utnapishtim (Noah) survivor of the Great Flood and the only human being to have ever been granted immortality by the gods (which shows the flood happened long before the epic.) To achieve this goal he must pass through the mountain of Mashu, a type of descent into the underworld, face guardian beings, and finally be ferried across the Waters of Life and Death to the east, the land of Dilmun.

Upon arrival in this fabled land Gilgamesh intently listens to Utnapishtim who then relates the narrative of the city of Shurrupak that stood on the banks of the Euphrates, a city that grew old as did the gods, and where the citizens of the city brought transgression against the gods:

“In those days the world teemed, the people multiplied, the world bellowed like a wild bull, and the great god was aroused by the clamour. Enlil heard the clamour and he said to the gods in council, “The uproar of mankind is intolerable and sleep is no longer possible by reason of the babel. So the gods agreed to exterminate mankind”. -Epic of Gilgamesh 108. [8]

This later retelling of the event leading up to the Ice Age flood make it seems as though the flood was the fault of the gods (Aryans) which of course could not be true if we put in into the historical context. The tellers of this tail blame their own near destruction on their god kings, and unlike the Vedic accounts the Semitic accounts seem to be written from the point of view of the vanquished rather than that of the Gods. This idea that the flood was caused by the god kings may have been a reflection of other tails found in Sumer called the Lamentations (the Sumerian lamentation texts of Ur, Eridug, Unug, Nibru, Urim, and Sumer.) These texts describe that Sumer’s fall was very tragic and bewail the destruction and desolation of various Sumerian cities. All these lamentation texts blame the destruction of Sumer on the use of ancient “Weapons of Terror,” a “great deadly cloud,” and a great storm “which destroyed houses” and “that burned sheepfolds” [9]. The detailed descriptions of their effects leave no doubt that the “Weapons of Terror” were nuclear weapons and that the antediluvian civilization preceding Sumer was poisoned by a deadly cloud of radioactive dust. Yet why would the ancients go to such extreme length to exterminate their hybrid creation and the rebel race-mixers? It is likely that these rebels commandeered some of these “weapons of terror’ and used them on their god kings.

Harappa and Mohenjo Daro are a testament to this as these are most definitely Aryan sites. Likewise, the radioactive fallout around the Great Lakes region is also in a strata when the descendants of the Solutrean culture had the Americas entirely to themselves.

From piecing together the ancient Semitic accounts (which also include the biblical version,) it seems that during the time of the Deluge many of the “Gods” escaped to the heavens which would be an ideal destination if an advance civilization were trying to escape nuclear fallout. From these same historical accounts it appears that the rebels of the war had to seek refuge within the earth.

“There were Nephilim in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bear children to them…” –Genesis 6

Many ancient archetypal accounts of a rebellion against the gods exist, a war in the heavens, and accounts of a fall or defeat of the lesser gods or demi-gods which were half “human” half god, i.e. a hybrid race. The story of the Nephilim shows how the “sons of God” (half slave-half Aryans i.e. quadroons) rebelled against God (the Aryans) and were now fallowing a new leader who lived within the earth, safe from nuclear attack.

“Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them. And the LORD said unto Satan, Whence comest thou? Then Satan answered the LORD, and said, From going to and fro in the earth, and from walking up and down in it”. -Job 1:6-7

Early Semitic peoples did in fact worship an archetypal god of the underworld of which they based off of the god Ba’al [10] also known as “Hadad” the god of storms [11] and where the legend of Satan is derived. This archetypal god of the underworld was known as Seth or Set and was seen as the ancestral deity of the early Semitic desert peoples known as the Hyksos who invaded Egypt during the 13th dynasty [12]. Set was associated with the planet Saturn since in ancient time this planet was farthest planet away from the sun that could still be seen with the naked eye. This association was symbolic of Set’s nature as the evil antipode of the holy Sun god Amen in Egyptian dualistic religion. He is often depicted with red hair displaying the racial connection between Seth and the Sumerian race-mixers.

It seems Seth worked his way into Hebrew mythology sometime later as the third son of Adam. This brings us to several biblical theological principals which indicate that the early Christian church knew on some level that the ancient Adamic slave race originally were Negroids, which later became mixed with Aryans creating the sub-race of the Semites, and ultimately that they were descended from an “evil god”. These four theological principals are:

  1. The Serpents Seedline
  2. Cain’s Mystery Wife
  3. The Mark or “Curse” of Cain
  4. The Children of Seth

First we must discuss a shadowy concept within the Jewish and Christian traditions known as “serpent seedline” theology, which is the idea that the “Serpent” in the Garden of Eden seduced Eve and that Cain was his offspring. This appears in early Gnostic writing such as the Gospel of Philip and also appeared in Jewish Midrashic texts of the 9th century. This idea was rejected as heresy by later Christian leaders [13] likely due to its implication that Satan himself has actual living descendants. It becomes apparent when reading Genesis that the first and second “sons of Adam” weren’t the only “humans” on earth at the time.

If it were, Cain would not have been able to find a wife as depicted in Genesis 4:17 chronologically before Adam and Eve had other “sons and daughters”. Hence the only explanation is that the “Race of Adam” was simply one race amongst other people.

This conjures the obvious question of what the race of Adam was exactly and brings us to a concept that is known as the “Mark” or “Curse” of Cain. In Genesis it is written that after Cain murdered his brother he was given a mark to distinguish him from other people, which also alluded to the existence of other races existing on earth at the time. This mark was described in an early Christian exegesis of the Syriac Church as black skin. In an Eastern Christian (Armenian) Adam-book (5th or 6th century), it is written: “And the Lord was wroth with Cain. . . He beat Cain’s face with hail, which blackened like coal, and thus he remained with a black face”. [14] Later writings by Franciscan monk Symon Semeonis relating the dark skin of the Romani (Gypsies) with the mark of Cain demonstrate that this idea was widespread within early Christendom [15]. This theological principal regarding the mark of Cain being black skin eventually became an important facet in the Protestant churches of the southern United States, as well as the Mormon Church.

The early Christian idea that Cain had dark skin, corresponds to the Aryan (gods) enslavement of Negritos in the Fertile Crescent, yet to understand how eventually only Semites and Aryans were left in this region we must study the early theological principal known as the “offspring of Seth”. It is recorded in Genesis that the majority of Cain’s line was wiped out with the flood, but that his line lived on in the sons of Ham with his wife Egyptus, which is why the darker skinned Caucasoids of North Africa today are considered to be Hamites or the descendants of Ham. But there is another way that the bloodline of Cain continued albeit more diluted in the offspring of Seth, which was the direct ancestor of Noah. The “Offspring of Seth” are mentioned in The Qumran (Dead Sea Scroll) fragment 4Q417 (4QInstruction,) which contains the earliest known reference to this title [16]. It states in the fragment that God had condemned the line of Seth for their rebellion.

Early references to the offspring of Seth rebelling from God depict the rebellion as mingling with the daughters of Cain creating a mixed race.

Works by rabbi Shimon bar Yochai, Augustine of Hippo, Julius Africanus [17] and the Letters attributed to St. Clement [18] all depict this rebellion. It is also the view expressed in the modern canonical Amharic Ethiopian Orthodox Bible [19]. It is important to note that biblical accounts are undoubtedly a later distortion of the older Semitic legends where the original historically Seth is the early Semitic god of the underworld and the patriarchal god of the Hyksos. Though, as can be seen by comparing Sumerian writings with biblical texts and putting them into context of historical facts, Seth was likely one of the rebellious “sons of God” who bred with the “daughters of men” thus creating the line of the Nephilim in Genesis 6.

Orthodox Judaism took a stance against the idea that Genesis 6 refers to angels or that angels could intermarry with men with rabbi Shimon bar Yochai pronouncing a curse on anyone teaching this idea. Pseudo-Philo, Biblical Antiquities 3:1–3 may also imply that the “sons of God” were human [20]. Consequently, most Jewish commentaries and translations describe the Nephilim as being from the offspring of “sons of nobles”, rather than from “sons of God” or “sons of angels” [21][22]. This is also the rendering suggested in the Targum Onqelos, Symmachus and the Samaritan Targum which read “sons of the rulers”, where Targum Neophyti reads “sons of the judges”.

Likewise, a long-held view among some Christians is that the “sons of God” were the formerly righteous descendants of Seth who rebelled, while the “daughters of men” were the unrighteous descendants of Cain, and the Nephilim the offspring of their union [22].

This view, dating to at least the 1st century AD in Jewish literature as described above, is also found in Christian sources from the 3rd century if not earlier, with references throughout the Clementine literature, [18] as well as in Sextus Julius Africanus, Ephrem the Syrian, and others.

This link between the archetypal Seth, and the “children of Seth,” the rebellion, and how he and his “offspring” became associated with the underworld is quite fascinating. As many accounts of deities were undoubtedly based on actual people, the same remains also of Satan, i.e. Set or Seth. Where his underground lair was located can only be speculated on but many accounts of ancient underground cities can be found in cultures around the world. Yet one such city complex known to modern archeologist almost defies belief. The underground city of Darinkuyu northeast of modern day Iraq (Sumer) in Capadocia, Turkey:

Darinkuyu is a vast and ancient cavernous lair capable of housing 20,000 people. This underground city could be sealed off from the inside with megalithic stone doors and had great ventilation shafts that went from the surface all the way to the water table where they supplied the inhabitance with fresh air and water. There were also wine and oil presses, stables, cellars, storage rooms, refectories, and chapels. Likewise, the city of Darinkuyu is connected to another underground city in Kayseri via a five mile long tunnel.

In excess of 200 underground cities containing a minimum of two levels have been discovered in the area between Kayseri and Nevsehir. Some 40 of those contain a minimum of three levels or more [23].

Who built these vast underground city complexes and how old they are is up for debate.

The “established” theory is that they were built around the 7th century B.C. by an Indo- European people known as Phrygians, though it seems that the technology required to build such a vast complex didn’t exist at this time. Likewise one must ask what reason the Phrygians would have to build such vast underground bunkers. It is likely that the Phrygians came to occupy these cities at a much later time than when they were actually built and that they were built rather to house antediluvian rebels seeking shelter underground from what can only be a nuclear attack. Turkish Historian Omer Demir, author of Cappadocia: Cradle of Civilization, [24] has developed the idea that this huge underground city complex was designed and built at the end of the Paleolithic era, right before the antediluvian flood, 12,5000 years ago and that the Phrygians merely discovered and expanded on this already megalithic structure. Due to the problematic ability of archeologists to date solid volcanic rock, no definitive era can be determined for its construction.

Gobekli-Tepe, an ancient megalithic stone site not far from Darinkuyu in the Southeastern Anatolia region has been dated to possibly the 10th millennium B.C. It is the most ancient example of megalithic construction currently accepted by mainstream archeology [25], and is constructed of more than 200 pillars, each pillar has a height of up to 20 feet and a weight of up to 20 tons. These pillars is carved with intricate artistic renderings of animals and have very straight and even plains and edges showing evidence of the use of advanced stone cutting devices. This site proves that humans had the capability and technology to carve monolithic stone in early Neolithic times, and it is entirely likely that the civilization that build Darinkuyu also built Gobekli-Tepe.

References:

  1. Brown Driver Briggs Hebrew Lexicon p. 658; Strongs H5307
  1. Hendel R. ed. Auffarth Christoph; Loren T. Stuckenbruck, The Fall of the Angels, Brill (22 Feb 2004), ISBN 978-90-04-12668-8 pp. 21, 34
  1. Van Ruiten, Jacques (2000). Primaeval History Interpreted: The Rewriting of Genesis I-II in the Book of Jubilees. Brill. p. 189. ISBN 9789004116580.
  1. Wright, Archie T. (2005). The Origin of Evil Spirits: The Reception of Genesis 6.1-4 in Early Jewish Literature. Mohr Siebeck. pp. 80–81. ISBN 9783161486562.
  1. .[citation Leemings, David (2009). The Oxford Companion to World Mythology. Oxford University Press. p. 21]
  1. Sitchin, Zecharia (March 1, 2002). “Genesis Revisited: Is Modern Science Catching Up With Ancient Knowledge?”
  1. George, Andrew R., trans. & edit. The Epic of Gilgamesh, Penguin Books, (1999), ISBN 0-14-044919-1
  1. Sanders, N. K., trans. Epic of Gilgamesh, (Baltimore: Penguin, 1960), 108.
  1. The Lament for Ur., Black, J.A., Cunningham, G., Robson, E., and Zólyomi, G., The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature, Oxford (1998).
  1. Sarah Iles Johnston (2009). Ancient Religions. p. 10.
  1. The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary, Vol. 1, New York: Doubleday, 1992, ISBN 978-0300140019.
  1. Hyksos (Egyptian dynasty). Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.
  1. “ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus – Christian Classics Ethereal Library”. Ccel.org.
  1. The History of Abel and Cain, 10, in Lipscomb, The Armenian Apocryphal Adam Literature, pp. 145, 250 (text) and 160, 271 (translation).
  1. Priest, Josiah(1843). “Slavery as it Relates to the Negro or African Race”
  1. Stone, Michael E., Selected studies in pseudepigrapha and apocrypha (1991) p. 248 paleographically dated by Milik as c. 150 BC
  1. “ANF06. Fathers of the Third Century: Gregory Thaumaturgus, Dionysius the Great, Julius Africanus, Anatolius, and Minor Writers, Methodius, Arn”.
  1. “KITĀB AL-MAGĀLL OR THE BOOK OF THE ROLLS. ONE OF THE BOOKS OF CLEMENT”.
  1. The Amharic text of Henok 2:1–3 (i.e. 1 En) (1962) Ethiopian Orthodox Bible may be translated as follows: “After mankind abounded, it became thus: And in that season, handsome comely children were born to them; and the Offspring of Seth, who were upon the Holy Mount, saw them and loved them. And they told one another, “Come, let us choose for us daughters from Cain’s children; let us bear children for us”.
  1. Kugel, James L., Traditions of the Bible: A Guide to the Bible As It Was at the Start of the Common Era
  1. [chabad.org translation]
  1. “Later Judaism and almost all the earliest ecclesiastical writers identify the “sons of God” with the fallen angels; but from the fourth century onwards, as the idea of angelic natures becomes less material, the Fathers commonly take the “sons of God” to be Seth’s descendants and the “daughters of men” those of Cain. —Jerusalem Bible, Genesis VI, footnote.
  1. https://www.cappadociaturkey.net/derinkuyu_underground_city.htm
  1. Demir, Omer (1993) Cappadocia : The Cradle of Civilization Published by Ajans-Turk Publishing and Printing Co. ISBN 10: 9757334014 ISBN 13: 9789757334019
  1. Curry, Andrew (November 2008). “Gobekli Tepe: The World’s First Temple?”. Smithsonian.com
Edit

Pub: 17 Nov 2021 01:50 UTC

Edit: 17 Nov 2021 01:54 UTC

Views: 340