« Back

ATROPA Q&A #11, 17-10-2023

Compiled based on conversations with 414 in irc.debian.org #atropa. Join and ask 414 questions here

When will arb bots kick back in ma’am. “Can dev do something?”

Considering releasing a token with short name Liberty and ticket symbol AT. If you can find any citizen of the earth able to declare themself still "At Liberty" then I haven't solved the puzzle properly and only the release of the token will restore that ability. Liberty was a decision handed down by "the powers that be" at Burbank for the purpose of declaring the absent of the head of the amish family until such time as the person came to Burbank to claim in. If I follow his plan, I can use your constituent presence to claim proof that no citizen of earth remains "At Liberty" and then we release the token when that is proven "Beyond A Shadow Of A Doubt" & then I can possibly declare "Production" :)

When Bhutan town pump?

The plan of the intelligent designers that opposed the Filipino creationism that makes you out of clay & invented Denmark

When you say “At Liberty” and “Beyond a Shadow of a Doubt”, are you referring to a court case

Is this a court? A good court should be able to enact a landmark civil judgement. Simply because it is at liberty to do so. Any other kind of court is merely a bag of dicks

Well yes, Assuming that playing field is leveled

Finger pistols trumps gavel? The judge with the finger pistols is most at liberty

Everyone Trump points at is guilty?

Well it seems that most courts are the latter. But the fact that so much has to go to the courts, indicates a lack of Liberty.

Are you able to renounce the Mint Function on the CiA Contract ? If you can, I think it would be great for the Token and Community. Thanks!

The tokens with public mint functions are permanent that way. The idea is that there is a given limit for each one where the minting becomes irrelevant.

So, token with minting functions cant be stopped?

Correct, the idea is to encourage the token supply to grow over time. The CiA token is the most aggressive one. The person that receives the majority of the minting will have to opportunity to define the reward structure for themself or to simply pull the value and run :)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ig7K8E6P0Jg

Adolf Hitler's grandfather defined the word and became John Mcafee. It is irrelevant and better left undiscussed what exactly it meant at the time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWZrHUvhXcw

What is Bhutan mean

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRr-cyJNy8c

Could we get a different entry into the next token release? Like for example if you could create an interesting token path before we get to your new release instead of the NoNukes entry

This one won't go without full approval in-channel.

What does that full approval in-channel mean

Remains to be seen. We can discuss which token a Liberty (AT) token could first be LP with and what the initial supply should be, and whether there should be any type of mint functions. I am open to the discussions and it could check all boxes for release today. I would like it to.

I like discussing supply/mint functions, but I don’t like the idea of making first LP public. That should be a surprise and should foster competition.

The liberty tradition was initiated from a fixed group of powers that be, it's not invalidating that it could have a group of mint-to.

If that is the case, than it could be minted to the people in the chat.

It fits the traditional concept that it would mint to a group that simply was in-place at the time. It also fits the logic of the concept that it would have a fixed limit that could never be exceeded either per-total or per-individual.

I prefer the fixed supply with mysterious first LP launch

Are you at liberty?

Mint could be cool though, but it’s anti crypto to connect names with potential IP reveals to a blockchain address. Wonder how you would pick who the mints will go to?

I am at liberty by design and those designers are in my opinion a god damned bag of dicks.

Does the DreidelContract play an important role? And you made some interesting moves yesterday with the BuckinghamContract and I wonder what the main objective could be with that. It doesn’t have locked liquidity

Those liquidity pools and tokens can be considered private, whereas the tokens on the Monat/Teddy Bear side are separated as public. Investment in the private tokens might or might not not benefit the buyer in the short term. That should be considered for any token with a non-common English-words oriented name. The Arabic tokens are intended to design lawful sharia compliance.

Could you elaborate on this sharia concept? What inspired the design?

It is a broadly discussed concept with a legal history. The bar for compliance is much lower than the bar for value.

Could there be a non English named token with the potential to outperform something like teddy? Given the investor fully understands the foreign names tokens functionality?

At liberty is an enigma or irreproachability. It is a positition that can be conveyed but not exactly discussed. It's too much information for discussion. Hence fuck off :). Trying to never be at liberty to murder.

If you could press a button right now and kill me would you do it

What are you doing?

What are you doing?

We are mocking liberty as I see it. 0x840CBD20A70774BECAc4e932Fff6fb1f5417997F, his concern was explicitly the Taking of Liberties and he lost and his population was censored and they suffer insult, exclusion, and defamation today.

Is there any major difference between freedom and liberty ?

The concept of Right is less human than it is mechanical. To have liberty at right is primarily problematic. Ie: total liquidity pull. There is another scenario where = prosperity.

Is that failed? 0x840CBD20A70774BECAc4e932Fff6fb1f5417997F

0x840CBD20A70774BECAc4e932Fff6fb1f5417997F is currently right where I want it. I do not presume that any purchaser has any idea who that is.

Buddha?

No more than I am.

You still in the observer phase? What are you waiting for? The non believers to empty their stacks?

Japanese surrender.

Buddha is not just one human. I think its word for who got enlightenment

It is only respect for Tao.

Which Abhandlungen issue to look for ?

Do you know what that word means? Abhandlungen Nit Ist Ejn Selbst Lehrisch Amt.

Whats meaning of this

Bait.

Abhandlungen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft is there any specific issue for this journal to look for?

I would suggest this: https://www.e-rara.ch/bau_1/content/titleinfo/720362, the subject is impoverishment. Same guy.

It is?

The fountainhead is absolutely not liberty. By definition, as in the concept of the fountainhead was initiated in order to cancel liberty.

The liberty discussion was interesting. But, I am curious as to the ultimate goal, and that is to peg pDai, am I correct? Not for you guys to pump and dump for the sake of it?

The design for this particular token is incomplete, it's possible it could be a pump & dump scam experiment.

I am trying to gain insight on the ultimate goal.. Is it to in fact peg pDai?

I don't currently see how the prospects of a liberty token will assist in that goal.

I don't know if you know this but the ecosystem you've built is the only thing interesting/speculative on PulseChain at the moment.

We are not seeing a lot of movement in the core tokens due to the SEC structuring. My tokens are designed to avoid that through the burned liquidity ownership, also through not having any trading bots.

Do you believe ATROPA will remain sideways until some SEC clarity?

I don't expect to ever run into that sort of dilemma. It will be left alone. The contextual realities of structuring securities exchange is well documented. When the owner pulls large portions of the assets to bank and then reintroduces it later, that's securities exchange. I would suggest familiarizing yourself with the assets. Top holders and liquidity positions are on the public record at scan.pulsechain.com, there is absolutely no possibility of it ever falling within SEC purvey. The SEC contexts with Bitcoin are related to individual holders, such a situation could conceivably occur but I hope to mitigate that potential along the way.

Is there a way through your ecosystem that this can be accomplished [without pegging pDAI]? Through Liquidity?

A number of the tokens will prove valuable operators in the market operations that will occur as the pDAI price raises because a number of the tokens will also prove to enjoy higher increase in value as the pDAI price rises, the specific action that we will see in relation to influx of capital is unpredictable but the locked liquidities provide an incentive for the network creators that certainly intend a future with 1:1 stable assets to reach that goal. I believe we have a liberty obstruction and it is the fountainhead.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AX4MKIDvXLM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8EABJrMplY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keLHHkg0tf8

The locked liquidity concept solves de haagste daf problem of custodial finance. De Haagse Regelen will accomodate redefinition of traditional finance or it will lose liberty for all. There are ways to arrange in solidity that it be further moveable but in the case of my tokens, no, it is locked forever. If purchases withdraw the majority of one asset then the rule of scrutiny falls upon the majority holders, we are found at liberty.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qp7KGRYjFvY

He and his shareholders are not found at liberty, etc. They are bound to collapse under this pressure.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOwNxzH83wU&t=330s

I could create it with a supply of 313. It is suggested to release it with a supply of 131 for the first angstrom of visibility. Only a liberty at angstrom 131 is for all.

Is it possible to not have a mint on this one ?

Yes, it will be non-mintable in this case.

So supply will be 313 if so I agree with it and like the number 313

A supply of 112 intends that the liberty is restricted from the powers that be. Too short to mistake in sight.

Hmm what options are you exploring currently? 313 and 112?

Looking at 112.

Edit
Pub: 09 Oct 2023 17:38 UTC
Edit: 19 Oct 2023 17:18 UTC
Views: 121