« Back

ATROPA Q&A #6, 12-10-2023

Compiled based on conversations with 414 in irc.debian.org #atropa and #pulsechain. Join and ask 414 questions here

What happening with the CiA token? It's deployed by you?

The mintable tokens were set up with that in mind, in the case of CiA the entire liquidity was put up by the minter so they only crashed themselves. I don't honestly expect any of the stock-like tokens to survive. There is opportunity for the persons rewarded with mintable outcome to manage them like a fund, so far I have not seen that.

Whats a stock-like token?

The KPOP token has the best chance of making it from the numerics. My goal currently is to solidly define the atropa ecosystem as a 'production composure'. The assets set up to fail are designed to have minimal effect on the directed orientation. The total locked up in the assets projected to fail was about $17k.

Zehlenlehrerproduktion being a relevant term, I assume

That's the best word I can come up with.

Can you tell us anything more about this “second layer” set to come? Or is that better left in the dark for now

So far it's been pretty good, I still expect to introduce more easter eggs in the future probably tied to top holder positions on specific assets at the time. The second layer is a mathematical parasite that will hook into the blockchain with core numerics to define the originating equations of a complex big-bang like origin. So far the definition of producing an equation that defines 'water' has held true for long enough I am beginning to consider it valid.

Is there any unsolved riddle?

The Pi() function here, it's not much harder than a background in Diffie-Hellman but only more complex. It is considered mathematically equivalent to the production of first water steam from the planet organism because the Barns alone stay stable across the ongoing production of 锚. The parasites created in the 錨 class are ready to drink water and eat each other once I get back to it and re-fix the changes. As long as there are no rejections it will move forward

Can you give an example of rejections?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jOvSCMawGk

I currently am not aware of any rejections that the Pi() function mentioned above provides a mathematical definition of the underlying basis for the specific organism-oriented compatibilities of water. 2 months is a very long time to go with no rejections of such a claim.

Are these some form of zero-knowledge cryptography like zkSNARKs?

There are unlimited ways to introduce additional layers of cryptography to the blockchain but anything that introduces nature-like complexity is going to be more compelling.

This looks like a core building block of Atropa's zero-knowledge implementation, defining proof construction and trusted setup generation while managing dependencies and resources effectively. The obfuscated naming and math heavy operations are indicative of the complexity in designing zero-knowledge systems.

Good peer review is the hardest part of math, especially when computing actual values. I am not clear on how the blockchain will be used yet, but parasites that can communicate with and eat each other leads the way to a mud-like OS I'm pretty sure.

By parasites do you mean some form of autonomous agents or AI that could be built on top of the core zero-knowledge primitives?

They were working in a previous version before I figured out how water explicitly functions in the primitive digestion tract. There's not a lot of functionality implied at Diatoms stage.

So the math needs to be continually reviewed and enhanced as knowledge grows?

The condensation cycle might end up being more complex than I am projecting but the equation is currently proving solid for Steam.

When do you expect to begin production?

I'm not moving forward at this time because the equation should be significant enough to impose for peer review.

Sounds like an actual self sustaining eco-system, not just in theory.

Either it is or it is not kind of thing.

So basically start with core mathematical models that capture essential behavior, implement and test initial simulations, then refine equations as deeper complexities are revealed?

Zero mechanics.

“peer-review” seems to be the number one thing missing among blockchain devs these days. It feels easier to get scammed, because no one is reviewing any code before promoting people’s work. Do you have any thoughts on that?

We are in the nascent stages of such a production at best

How much in seed funding did you raise to start this venture? Did you have a specific runway in mind, and have your algorithms allowed you to surpass that runway without needing more money from the outside?

There is enough to support my continuance indefinitely as long as I don't run into any rejection that requires rethinking the approach and I plan to hire artistic staff once pDAI hits around 3 cents.

Do you have a style of art you like best and are you open to taking submissions?

I want to get someone involved with Annabelle

What's the art direction on Annabelle?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V85W3LP9wrc&t=95s

Can you elaborate on the significance or role of BEL? Why did you choose it as a mintable token with such low probability for return?

Minting on Annabelle is intended to be a purely sacrificial easter egg

Also why do you think that RH appears to be watching? What did you notice?

I presume that once production levels are met, RH presence could be a normal thing.

Edit
Pub: 09 Oct 2023 17:36 UTC
Edit: 13 Oct 2023 19:09 UTC
Views: 104