« Back

ATROPA Q&A #7, 13-10-2023

Compiled based on conversations with 414 in irc.debian.org #atropa and #pulsechain. Join and ask 414 questions here

What on Trump for what?

Me too

How was the Trump connection made? Rumors are Barron is very active on-chain, Eth to be a bit more specific.

The fraternal order production has specific rules about appearances. Gonna make them a brutal amount of money. So far so good?

What do you call a blind dinosaur?

Mormon?

What do you call a blind dinosaur’s dog?

Mormon?

Why do programmers always mix up Christmas and Halloween?

Mormons?

Brutal production = quality production?

Depends on the mess. Trying to make a total mess of Eva Braun on the way out. Worthless hoe. Dreidel ftw

Feel free to ignore me on this but are you a male or female

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9E8ivvHHEsw

Can you please give me some insight into what you're doing when you send lp to different token addresses? Are you using functions that we can't see due to the contract not being verified? For example, I see you sent the last launch, Bhutan 👑 to Annabelle: The Profit. Can you tell me a bit about that?

Looking at FDIC today as the phi gamma delta fraternity scam at Anhui between Chad, Bhutan, Green Island, and Philadelphia. The documented premise for their policy is "the bamboo deposit" and the insured party is referred to in documentation as bobo in Bhutanese the language translates to decree delight happiness. The pre-1947 cree and Nuhuatl histories of the Vatican were declared 'the dark ages'. We should be able to take over the Vatican by the time Atropa hits $2.

Are the ties between [MCM and Comoros] nefarious?

The Vermont Teddy Bear Company from Green Island declared Aristotelian Comoros a victimhood upon the establishment of the 3rd mint of United States at Arkansas.

You are saying Teddy Bear will pump?

The comical production started with Danish magistrate Nils Brock, aka Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel aka Alexander Pope and the Vermont Teddy Bear Company at Green Island.

Is this token already out?

I own a guitar that was stolen from James Iha.. there might be a token produced if I ever return it to him. He only recorded landslide with it. I don't think he cares. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CnNBQ0yzW1M

How many guitars did the pumpkins lose? I heard of the Gish Guitar that was returned

The singer from the band Enkindel stole all their crap.

I am curious to see what happens when the number of tokens created becomes 666. Now in scan it comes out 606. Does it have any relationship with the tokens created with supply 666?

If there's anything with a supply of 606 then 10 tokens were burned. Interesting things could happen price wise over time if those tokens are burned with the locked liquidities in place. I really don't know what the long term outlook is.

Are you talking about tokens like CODE =3?

In general with any low supply token with any amount of locked liquidity that sees burning and might have cause for someone to want to be a leaderboard holder of.

Is there a reliable way to see funds bridging in/out? there seems to be patterns with BTC flows. Is there any plan on fund retention ie staking of some sort, to reduce whales splashing about?

There will not be any form of staking but there may be additional conversions to combine multiple tokens to one.

Are you oppose staking, what about third party staking.. people can create this. I expect teddy to be on 9inch? combining tokens sound like a exciting twist.

Any interest like return is anti-sharia. So I won't be doing that.

Curious on SNL, you minted myself and a couple bad actor wallets that had been dead for 2 months. one woke up and destroyed the chart. was that a curiosity thing too see what would happen?

I expected the addresses minted to to pull, yes.. but any that do not and contribute to growth of the token will see more reward later.

Well there are multiple methods, but essentially rewarding the long term holders who delay gratification over the swing traders who push the pump and dump. I think it does serve a purpose in retention.

Things will start to get interesting as more wallets of greater holding get involved, conversion into consolidated higher-value tokens should cause an additional pump in the restrained supply chain. That's the point where we see collapse every time so far in crypto. I hope to maintain a majority share that will afford the capacity to lock further liquidity as the bubble occurs instead of any massive securities-exchange type withdrawal.

Ok I see so as you hold the majority in future price movement manipulation becomes more difficult.

Manipulation becomes more difficult only as liquidity is locked so far as I see it.

Do you know anything about the 5,555 pDAI and then 300m pDAI that was recently "donated" to SENS coinbase wallet?

I'm not familiar in any way with sens.

Make a payable minting function that you pay tokens to mint and those mints are just then added to liquidity. would be cool to be able to withdraw the value from trading fees but could be difficult to implement.

Too complicated. I foresee more of a system where tokens are combined into something new & then the primary holding/contract creator manually locks up liquidities as they come in. Just more of what is going on already as trust in the contract creator is built and the locking more and more outweighs the holding this seems feasible.

When you say combined, do you mean an additional function? or as now we buy and swap between tokens?

Like the FPMB bond.

Any further development on Dysnomia?

There won't be any forward progress while securing the bottom line.

Edit
Pub: 09 Oct 2023 17:36 UTC
Edit: 14 Oct 2023 19:44 UTC
Views: 91