Very best safest distance from your 5G cell System

If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. http://b3.zcubes.com/v.aspx?mid=11186125 look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

<img width="368" src="https://rawfoodlife.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/5g-cell-tower.jpeg">
These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although http://librajaw02.jigsy.com/entries/general/What-lengths-Away-Can-A-single-Be-From-a-5G-Mobile-Tower-Before-Becoming-Hazardous 're not as visible, they still can create issues for users.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.

http://note.pearltrees.com/14124291/d213407a0b9bf9fa7bd533556bd81c1d (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to a wide range of potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

In the event that you've used cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further your location from the tower.

While it sounds like an ideal idea however, people who live close to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas.

But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body and is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.

Edit
Pub: 26 Apr 2023 21:35 UTC
Views: 20