Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Structure
If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. https://etextpad.com/ appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.
They are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause problems for people.
https://click4r.com/posts/g/9249362/ determine the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to many possible harms, like the formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
<img width="456" src="https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/theadvocate.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/b/fb/bfb70fe5-208a-5e1f-9e14-e4b4e525fc5c/5cd4a7a11c153.image.jpg">
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further away your location from the tower.
While this sounds like something that's good, the reality is that those living close to towers might be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther distance from them.
However, this study also found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is because RF radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
https://tablebox3.bloggersdelight.dk/2023/04/26/how-long-should-i-stay-coming-from-a-5g-mobile-tower/ for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. They include the false belief that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the effect of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.