What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Structure
If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause issues for users.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.
https://mondaybeaver37.werite.net/post/2023/04/26/How-Far-Can-You-Proceed-From-a-5G-Cell-phone-Tower-Without-Being-Unsafe (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body areas. This could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis and cataracts, and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest location from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ in the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. https://price-holm.mdwrite.net/very-best-minimum-acceptable-length-between-yourself-plus-a-5g-mobile-tower-system would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For https://pastelink.net/hl97a4lh , exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.
<img width="405" src="https://emfadvice.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/5g-towers-close-up-1024x669.jpg">