Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower system

If you've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

They are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

<img width="393" src="https://preview.redd.it/43i5zt756wo41.jpg?width=1620&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=187425909546039a5c7abadc9e25664b80b8a1dc">

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of potential problems, including an increased the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

Have you ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that the safest location from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away the tower is.

While http://note.pearltrees.com/14124385/d28548853d603429a621aa7c94bc0555 sounds like something that's good but the truth is that those living close to towers might be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who lived farther distance from them.

This study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. https://fnote.me/notes/49NXyh is also the largest organ of the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).

This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In http://smokecake75.jigsy.com/entries/general/What-lengths-Away-Can-1-Be-From-a-new-5G-Mobile-Tower-system-Before-Becoming-Dangerous of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.

Edit
Pub: 27 Apr 2023 00:07 UTC
Views: 24