What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Tower
If https://fnote.me/notes/k52sT6 've ever walked through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could cause problems for people.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one kilogram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could result in a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders like dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that the safest range from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further the tower is.
While it sounds like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that those living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
<img width="476" src="http://ww3.hdnux.com/photos/32/25/63/6905062/9/920x920.jpg">
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on several assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
Additionally to https://ide.geeksforgeeks.org/tryit.php/2fa8d736-41c5-4188-8e4e-435391bc963e , ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly https://beige-ferret-wb20km.mystrikingly.com/blog/how-long-away-from-some-sort-of-5g-mobile-tower-for-anyone-who-is is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.