Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell System

If you've ever walked through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. https://notes.io/qNCGB appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.

<img width="409" src="https://www.mkna.org/wp-content/uploads/bfi_thumb/dummy-transparent-o686juuatixh0tbw5k8vjgmzhdswok6fpbpm38fkte.png">
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could result in many possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it.

Although this may sound like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther distance from them.

But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may be absorbed by the body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

https://www.openlearning.com/u/rasmussensun-rtp81y/blog/WhatIsTheSafestDistanceComingFromA5GCellSystem ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effects of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. https://brask-schwartz-2.technetbloggers.de/what-lengths-can-you-get-from-a-5g-cell-phone-tower-without-getting-unsafe-1682758033 are not compatible with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.

Edit Report
Pub: 29 Apr 2023 14:00 UTC
Views: 77