Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower

If you've ever walked through a town you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.

They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
https://golden-bison-wb0w0r.mystrikingly.com/blog/what-is-the-safest-distance-from-a-5g-cell-tower determine the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.

https://squareblogs.net/strawoctave3/how-far-should-i-remain-from-a-5g-portable-tower (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

Have you ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away you are from it.

While it sounds like an ideal idea however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who were away from the antennas.

This study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. https://www.pearltrees.com/salarybeach9/item515567638 has shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ of the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.

<img width="363" src="https://edmonton.citynews.ca/wp-content/blogs.dir/sites/15/2020/04/CHAN803-414_2020_124735.jpg">
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This could result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.

Edit
Pub: 29 Apr 2023 14:31 UTC
Views: 27