Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower
If you've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although https://lioncar50.bravejournal.net/post/2023/04/25/Very-best-safest-distance-from-your-5G-cell-Tower 're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data which show that the energy of RF can cause harm to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. https://neville-dunn.blogbright.net/are-usually-safest-distance-coming-from-a-5g-cell-tower-system-1682462582 's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. This can lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
https://pastelink.net/i9wt5dwo
Have you ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away the tower is.
Although this may sound like a good idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who were away from the antennas.
<img width="497" src="https://files.constantcontact.com/7a1d285f301/ee155876-a4f4-4448-8657-b4437a90b7df.jpg?a=1128428243356">
However, this study also showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. This includes the false belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e., tissue heating).
This also overlooks the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.