Labour Policies That Hurt Post-Brexit UK but Would Benefit Inside the EU
πŸ“… Date Range: Last 3 months (Starmer government)
πŸ“ Status: Confirmed alignment with EU frameworks, despite domestic cost
🎯 Strategic Interpretation: These moves only make full sense if the UK intends to rejoin or integrate more deeply with the EU.

πŸ” 1. EU Food Safety Alignment (ECJ Oversight)
βš–οΈ Policy Align UK food safety rules with EU veterinary standards
πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Post-Brexit UK Blocks US trade deals (e.g., chlorinated chicken), weakens UK’s global trade sovereignty
πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί If in EU Smooth intra-EU trade, regulatory certainty, ECJ oversight is standard

πŸ”— Strategic Cost: UK gives up regulatory autonomy
πŸ”— Strategic Benefit (in EU): Trade friction dissolves, market access restored

🐟 2. 12-Year EU Fishing Access Deal
βš–οΈ Policy EU boats get UK water access until 2037
πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Post-Brexit UK Undermines the fishing sovereignty Brexit promised; enrages coastal voters
πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί If in EU Fits naturally within the Common Fisheries Policy

πŸ”— Strategic Cost: Betrays symbolic industry Brexit fought for
πŸ”— Strategic Benefit (in EU): Shared resource logic applies; tension neutralised

πŸŽ’ 3. Youth Mobility Scheme (Free Movement Backdoor)
βš–οΈ Policy Labour exploring new UK-EU youth mobility agreement
πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Post-Brexit UK Sparks backlash over migration control erosion
πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί If in EU Seamless integration into freedom of movement principles

πŸ”— Strategic Cost: Undermines hardline immigration optics
πŸ”— Strategic Benefit (in EU): Fills labor shortages, improves EU goodwill, reintegrates youth into Euroculture

πŸ›οΈ 4. Employment Rights Bill (EU Labour Law Redux)
βš–οΈ Policy Enhanced job security, worker rights, fair pay protections
πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Post-Brexit UK Raises costs for businesses; dampens competitiveness under independent rule
πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί If in EU Mirrors EU-wide worker protection standards

πŸ”— Strategic Cost: Red tape narrative fuelled domestically
πŸ”— Strategic Benefit (in EU): Restores alignment with social-democratic labor model

🌱 5. Green Investment Targets (2030 Grid Decarbonisation)
βš–οΈ Policy Aim to eliminate fossil fuels from grid by 2030
πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Post-Brexit UK Expensive without EU green funding; risky in isolation
πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί If in EU Co-funded through EU innovation grants, carbon credits, bloc-wide grid projects

πŸ”— Strategic Cost: Strains national budget, opens them to opposition attack
πŸ”— Strategic Benefit (in EU): Would access €billions in support, tech, R&D

🧬 Interpretation: These Policies Only Make Coherent Long-Term Sense in an EU Context
Policy Current Effect (πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§) Strategic Fit (πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί)
Food Safety Alignment Trade-off with global deals Eases trade within EU, legal standard
Fishing Access Breach of Brexit sovereignty Norm in EU fisheries coordination
Youth Mobility Undermines border control optics Matches freedom of movement structure
Employment Rights Business resistance Core to EU labor protections
Green Energy Targets Costly, risky alone EU-backed transition plan and funding

🧠 Final Take:
These aren’t just random policy stumbles.

They’re intentional EU-style policies enacted outside of EU infrastructureβ€”causing domestic friction now, but laying groundwork for:

Future narrative: β€œThese were good policiesβ€”they only hurt because we weren’t in the EU.”

Future leverage: β€œSee? It only works properly if we rejoin.”

Future framing: β€œBrexit sabotaged Britain. Rejoining fixed it.”

Edit Report
Pub: 19 May 2025 11:11 UTC
Views: 12