What is the safest distance coming from a 5G cell System
If https://fnote.me/notes/zz0ZST 've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could create issues for users.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.
https://ide.geeksforgeeks.org/tryit.php/db545ccb-3462-4469-a104-74610a385252 (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one kilogram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to various potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used mobile phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away your location from the tower.
Although this may sound like something that's good, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those living further away from the antennas.
This study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
<img width="364" src="https://www.danella.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/5g-cell-tower.jpg">
This is because radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore there is https://nyborg-greene.federatedjournals.com/what-is-the-safest-distance-from-a-5g-cell-tower-1682609526 that both ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.