Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system

If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
https://controlc.com/634f1708 of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

<img width="496" src="https://www.counterpointresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/antenna-blue-sky-cell-tower-94844.jpg">

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. https://etextpad.com/ for exposure are based on research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can result in many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further your location from the tower.

Although this may sound like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers might be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther far from antennas.

However, this study also found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against mechanical injury, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to the limited radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effects of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

Furthermore, the ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.

Edit
Pub: 26 Apr 2023 21:51 UTC
Views: 43