Bello /Ne
Queen Bulu's Extended Typology
Hi everyone. My name is Blue and I'm 16 years old. Typology is a special interest of mine and I like to talk about it One thing I like about typology is that it has an appeal for virtually anyone. Fe doms might like it because they get to interact and learn more about people, E9s might like it as to feel more comfortable in their identity, 2Ls might like it because they like the logical consistency but the ability to talk and learn more about things... There is something for everyone!
Anything boldened is either a type or something important.
Anything dotted is a link.
Anything italicised is just for emphasis.
Apologies for phone users... You can view it on mobile, it's just significantly better on computer LOL
ENTJ (Te>Ni=Se>Fi) sp/so 387 (3w2) + VLFE Choleric-Sanguine LIE-1Te ET(N) [S]CO/E/I Mo[T]WvRx
Few things right off the bat...
- Low Fi and high Te doesn't innately make me some evil villain
- I relate to Sp3/E3 in general the most + Enneagram is my favourite system
- There are several systems I don't like that you'll read about later
- People are still people beyond their theoretical typology. The boxes fit to you, not the other way around.
I am definitely an ENTJ. I've been misread as ESxP a lot as I'm not a very stereotypical one, and because I typed as E8 for a long time (Yeesh). I typed as ENTP for a while there, but nothing else in MBTI fits like ENTJ does. You can read more about that on my Bearblog if you like!
I said I was TeSe for a good while, and considering that was summer, it's a very fair observation. But I've come to find out that my Ni is a lot more developed than I once thought it was--I'm just really bad at seeing it beyond the mega aggressive Te and the playful Se. So, even though I'm technically TeNi, I still write Ni=Se, seeing as they tend to work either at the same time (Ni: Hold on a minute Se: Dude fuck me in the ass I want it now) or that's just what's most visible to other people.
I have a whole theory about how NiFe's seem a lot more extroverted than they really are because their Fe works overdrive to overcompensate their unappearing Ni, but that's for a later post.
Back on track, I am also... Sp3! Surprise, Sp3cialgirl is a Sp3. I relate to So3 and Sp2 a good amount too (mostly So3), and somewhat Sx3 (as you can find above in the plus sign for my full enneagram rankings), but nothing fits like good ol' Sp3.
VLFE... Ahhh....Psychosophy... My old friend
This was the first system I got into that was actually just beyond MBTI and enneagram wings because--surprise surprise, it's super simple and frankly pretty easy to learn. When people don't overcomplicate it that is... The thing is, when you get a system as simple as psychosophy, some people like to overcomplicate it. It happened to Classical Jungian = MBTI, and now the rage is Psychosophy = Attitudinal Psyche.
I type as VLFE, as seen as above. I am definitely 1V, no doubts about it. The only time I thought I might've been 3V was when I was in a really dark spot. I'm 1V queen. I typed as VFLE for a little while. I think it appeared like I had low logic as a kid, particularly 1V/4L and then maybe even 1V/3L when I was a young teenager (12-15). But that was just a raging 2L with massive insecurities, as any teenager has...
I sometimes feel as if AP/Psychosophy is a flawed system, because aside from 1V, I feel (at least somewhat) connected to 3F, 3L, and even 3E. I think I'm just a very aggressive person LOL. That's not entirely negative, but still, it's a part of me. Anyway--I've never felt particularly connected to 2L/4E, as slightly mentioned above. But there is no way in hell that I'm 2E/4L, so that's just What I'm Going With. Can't do much about it.
If you're interested in what I consider "good descriptions" for AP/Psychosophy, this guy on Reddit has made some GREAT examples. Bare in mind they're a little exaggerated, and slightly 2D... But I don't blame them. They're pretty good regardless. Volition, Emotion, Physics, Logic.
Well, now we're on Jungian and Socionics. If you are a fan of MBTI, you may be skipping over this and sighing. If you're a MBTI hater, this is your MBTI. Make sense?
Socionics is...hard to think about. I appreciate it for all that it is, and I love researching it, but I can completely understand why someone would skip over socionics in favour of other systems, and just view it as a predecessor to 'better' or more 'efficient' systems. That being said, I think the complexities of the system are for a reason! I do believe I get more out of socionics on a regular basis against something like MBTI (LIE-1Te vs ENTJ).
Lets look at Te in Jungian, MBTI, and Socionics.
Jungian: Mostly concerned with objective logic to structure the whole external world. Needs actual measurable criteria.
MBTI: Mostly concerned with quick decisions. Organisation, productivity, often without deep theoretical nuance. Doing things to get them done.
Socionics: Mostly concerned with research and theoretics. Deals with things by figuring out 'how to make them better'. Described as a lot more blunt and Ni heavy than the other two.
Jung and MBTI Te seem quite similar, but it's important to note that Jung = theoretical function of consciousness, MBTI = behavioral trait. Jungian Te is more about the actual stream of consciousness that happens and their internal mental mechanisms. MBTI is often frowned upon for this reason, because MBTI Te is moreso about a personality trait. MBTI simplifies Te into observable patterns, so how someone tends to act. It focuses on things like being efficient, decisive, structured, goal-oriented... It doesn’t dive into why someone processes info that way, just that they do it.
Socionics is a slightly different kettle of fish. Many people have noted that those who relate best to the socionic description of 'ENTJ' (or, in this case, LIE), tend to be ENTJ e7. Though, in this case, it's good to remember that Socionics and MBTI don't necessarily correlate like that. Just that it's common.
I actually relate to LIE-1Te quite a lot. I find it's actually very representative. Though it's not exactly and entirely me, I feel it hits the nail on the head a lot closer than the ENTJ description. Interesting.
Hi there. This is a WIP. come back later to find out more about me typology...