What is the safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system

If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.

<img width="345" src="https://ai4beginners.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/communication-5050339_1920-1536x864.jpg">
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.

https://tablebox3.bloggersdelight.dk/2023/04/25/what-lengths-away-from-some-sort-of-5g-mobile-structure-is-safe/ (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could result in a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. https://lloyd-lauritzen.thoughtlanes.net/very-best-safest-distance-from-a-5g-cell-system-1682459697 is because the transmitting power of cell towers increases drastically the farther your location from the tower.

While it sounds like a good idea however, those living close to towers might be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther far from antennas.

But, the study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is because RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body. It is accountable for protecting other organs.
https://fnote.me/notes/mZ7DpD for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they should not be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.

Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.

Edit
Pub: 26 Apr 2023 02:06 UTC
Views: 28