What is the safest distance from your 5G cell System

If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause issues for users.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on research that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis, cataracts and skin cancer.

Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever operated a cell phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further away your location from the tower.

<img width="441" src="https://cordcutting.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/5G-cell-tower.jpg">
While it sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that those living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who were away from the antennas.

This study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the body's outer layer, the skin. It is vital to be aware of this because the skin acts as a shield against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ of the human body. https://eliasen-fowler.hubstack.net/how-far-can-you-move-coming-from-a-5g-mobile-phone-tower-without-being-unsafe is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
https://mexicomilk1.bloggersdelight.dk/2023/04/27/are-usually-minimum-acceptable-length-between-yourself-along-with-a-5g-mobile-system/ on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences of short bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. http://clavecollar7.jigsy.com/entries/general/How-Far-Should-I-Keep-From-a-5G-Mobile-phone-Tower are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such they should not be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.

Edit
Pub: 29 Apr 2023 08:38 UTC
Views: 48