Are usually safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower

If you've ever wandered through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can cause issues for users.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.

https://moran-loft.hubstack.net/what-is-the-safest-distance-from-a-5g-cell-structure-1682459682 (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further your location from the tower.

<img width="369" src="https://www.cbs42.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/81/2019/10/thumbnail_IMG_0342.jpg?w=1280">

While http://lizardsled4.xtgem.com/__xt_blog/__xtblog_entry/__xtblog_entry/33948839-very-best-minimum-acceptable-range-between-yourself-and-a-5g-mobile-system?__xtblog_block_id=1#xt_blog sounds like an ideal idea but the truth is that those living close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For https://tablebox3.bloggersdelight.dk/2023/04/25/what-lengths-away-from-some-sort-of-5g-mobile-structure-is-safe/ , a 2014 study in India discovered that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those living further distance from them.

This study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know since the skin serves as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the biggest organ in the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effect on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their limit of exposure to the local SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.

Edit
Pub: 25 Apr 2023 22:53 UTC
Views: 34