Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell Tower system

If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create issues for users.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research which prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.

The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. https://pastebin.pl/view/8c4e592d could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that a safe location from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further your location from the tower.

<img width="360" src="https://media.wired.com/photos/5e1e3daf43940d0008009163/master/w_2560%2Cc_limit/Biz-5gtower-1187777089.jpg">

While it sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther far from antennas.

But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. https://ide.geeksforgeeks.org/tryit.php/70865490-896c-4330-bfac-9cdd3063574e have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. https://fnote.me/notes/j24ZAZ includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiation is safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the consequences of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This could result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.

Edit

Pub: 26 Apr 2023 22:30 UTC

Views: 46