Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system

If you've ever been through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

https://writeablog.net/skinfoot6/what-lengths-should-i-keep-from-your-5g-cell-phone-tower are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable however, they could cause issues for users.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could be harmful to health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one kilogram of tissue.

Since https://telegra.ph/How-Far-Away-From-a-5G-Mobile-Structure-Had-you-been-04-29 is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further away the tower is.

While this sounds like something that's good however, people living in close proximity to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health problems. For https://rentry.co/psz86 , a 2014 study in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who were distance from them.

However, this study also showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ in the human body and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

<img width="469" src="https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-4ef4c745e156593f3efc3cae5902c99d">

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption is also ignoring the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals and the effect on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.

Edit
Pub: 29 Apr 2023 13:48 UTC
Views: 48