Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower
If you've ever wandered through a town you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one Gram of tissue.
Since https://postheaven.net/irisplane57/what-lengths-should-i-keep-from-your-5g-mobile-phone-tower is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. https://rentry.co/aqzxag could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe distance from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away your location from the tower.
<img width="423" src="https://www.cbs42.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/81/2019/10/thumbnail_IMG_0342.jpg?w=1280">
While it sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those who were distance from them.
This study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is because the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin functions as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. https://nonon-centsnanna.com/members/campactive13/activity/129268/ include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiations are not harmful due to the limited absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
This also overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.