Very best safest distance coming from a 5G cell Tower

If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can cause issues for users.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.

https://zenwriting.net/saltpansy1/very-best-minimum-acceptable-distance-between-yourself-along-with-a-5g-mobile of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram averaged over one gram of tissue.

Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis and skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized maximum power density of four mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
https://onepetcare.com/members/deeroffer8/activity/133254/ for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of the transmission of cell towers increases drastically the further the tower is.

While this sounds like an ideal idea however, people who live close to towers may actually be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that those living within 50 meters of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those living further away from the antennas.

However, this study also found that people who moved to areas that were further from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. It is also the biggest organ in the human body. It is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

<img width="461" src="https://www.incomeinvestors.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/cell-phone-tower-on-top-of-residential-building-in-city-5g-antenna-base-broadcast-broadcasting-cell_t20_xXn3pX.jpg">
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).

The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the consequences of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure standards.

In addition to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their limit of exposure to the local SARs based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic results. https://han-mcgrath-2.technetbloggers.de/very-best-safest-distance-from-your-5g-cell-tower-system-1682479595 could result in an increased risk of adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.

Edit Report
Pub: 26 Apr 2023 05:01 UTC
Views: 39